A growing number of classic car collectors across the U.S. are reporting experiences with questionable restoration practices, raising concerns about potential fraud in an industry once built on trust and craftsmanship. As more restoration disputes come to light, experts warn that some businesses may be taking advantage of collectors’ emotional and financial investments in vintage vehicles.
One high-profile dispute has emerged in Pierce County, Washington, where a civil case involving Defenders Northwest, LLC—a business known for Land Rover Defender restorations and outdoor gear—has captured attention. According to court filings, the company is accused of taking more than $200,000 from out-of-state collectors for a restoration project that allegedly never materialized. The plaintiffs claim they supplied both a donor vehicle and substantial funding, only to receive a rusted-out vehicle shell missing key identifying elements, such as the VIN number.
Court records state that the agreement began in February 2015, with the collectors waiting nearly eight years for progress. In August 2022, Defenders Northwest—through its operators Brian and Michele Hall and their attorney—filed a chattel lien notice in Pierce County, claiming over $68,000 in fees. The charges included labor, storage, interest, and sales tax.
However, a court-ordered inspection later determined that the vehicle associated with the lien appeared to be a mismatched and incomplete car, allegedly not the original vehicle provided. The court subsequently dismissed the lien, finding it invalid. The plaintiffs are now seeking reimbursement of legal fees. The defendants are continuing to contest the matter, and no final judgment has been issued on the broader allegations at the time of this writing.
Attorneys representing Defenders Northwest, including those from the national law firm Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, have denied wrongdoing on behalf of their clients. The business is reportedly insured through Liberty Mutual, and litigation remains ongoing.
This Washington case is not an isolated incident. In New York, federal prosecutors recently charged Clark P. Rittersbach, the operator of Concours Classic Motor Cars, with wire fraud. He is accused of misappropriating more than $1.15 million from clients under the pretense of performing high-end restorations. The case is still in process, and Rittersbach is presumed innocent until proven otherwise.
Elsewhere, a 2023 civil judgment in Iowa awarded over $7 million in damages against The Healey Werks Corp for breach of contract related to multiple restorations. Plaintiffs in that case claimed delays, missed deadlines, and failure to deliver completed cars.
According to industry observers, some shops accused of misconduct have maintained a facade of legitimacy—operating well-designed websites, posting glowing reviews, and participating in community events like classic car rallies. This perceived credibility can make due diligence more difficult for prospective clients.
“They present an image of trustworthiness and craftsmanship, but behind the scenes, it’s all smoke and mirrors,” said Elizabeth Puckett, an automotive journalist quoted in prior reports on similar cases. “Once these businesses gain possession of a vehicle, owners may lose significant leverage.”
Legal experts caution that once a business has control of a car, it can file liens, inflate charges, or in some cases, attempt to shield itself from civil action through bankruptcy. In the Washington case, for instance, court filings show that the defendants have pursued bankruptcy protection, which could complicate recovery efforts.
Federal agencies, including the FBI, are reportedly monitoring a growing number of classic car fraud complaints, some of which involve international victims. With litigation and investigations ongoing, collectors are being advised to take extensive precautions.
Steps recommended by experts include thoroughly researching restoration shops, requesting references, verifying licensing and insurance, visiting physical facilities, and securing clear, enforceable contracts that protect both parties.
While many reputable restorers continue to serve the collector community, recent lawsuits and criminal complaints serve as reminders of the risks involved. For those entrusting their prized vehicles to others, vigilance remains as essential as passion.
Disclaimer:
The information provided in this article is based on publicly available court records, news reports, and expert commentary as of the date of publication. All parties mentioned are presumed innocent until proven otherwise in a court of law. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Any opinions expressed are those of quoted individuals and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher. Readers are encouraged to verify information independently and consult with legal professionals when evaluating specific situations.
